Articles

October 24, 2024

Thoughts on Nearing 89: A Bagatelle



If I survive the coming election about which I have a sense of anticipatory dread and then continue to live for another month or so, I shall reach the end of my octogenarian decade and turn, unless I can find a way to turn back, the age of 89, an age that I find entirely rebarbative.  The reason it so repels me is not what you may imagine.  No, it has to do with one of my many quirks – a hatred of prime numbers ending in nine.  It’s easy to think of them – 19, 59, 79, and the worst one of all, 89.  There must be a term for this, as there is, for instance, for the fear of the number 13, which as any literate person knows is called triskaidekaphobia.  Well, my webmaster, Kevin Williams, who knows everything, just told me.  I am a primonumerophobe .

Living so long also makes me wonder what I am still doing here.  My spiritual friends, never loath to resort to the nearest cliché, keep telling me that if I’m still here, it means that “my work is not done.” To which I think, though I will rarely utter the word aloud, “balderdash.”  

For years, I have joked that I have already entered my afterlife, that my life is over, and I now exist in a kind of interminable epilogue.  I mean, consider:  I can no longer hear well, my vision is even worse, and, having been crippled for years by a progressive case of spinal stenosis, I can no longer walk either.  Well, I can.  I do totter about my house being very careful not to fall, but I can’t really go anywhere.  A trip – hoping I don’t – out to my patio is about the limit of my excursions.  I haven’t been able to travel anywhere for years, and even going out to a restaurant is fraught with risk.  

Worse in a way is that I can no longer do any meaningful work.  I published my last two books earlier this year, and my blogging life is about to come to an end.  Partly because of my bad vision, but mainly because I have run out of ideas what to write about.  It’s hard for me now to read the kind of books I used to, which would not only provide fuel for what’s left of my brain, but give me topics, such as animal cognition, I used to love to write about.  No more.  I just can’t hack it.

So, what’s the point, Alfie? From my point of view, I am just marking time, like a prisoner waiting for his sentence to end, scratching off the days on the calendar on the wall of his cell.

Some of you know that when I was in my early eighties, I wrote a little book of mostly humorous essays I whimsically entitled Waiting to Die.  The conceit of that book was my goal of living to the age of 1000 – months.  That would get me out of here at the age of 83.  No such luck.  I blew past it and just kept on keeping on.  I sometimes joked that I just didn’t have the knack for dying.  I don’t understand why it’s so easy for so many people.  But where death is concerned, I seem to be an abysmal failure.   If I were to write a sequel to that book, I would have to call it Still Waiting.

I’ve always thought about when I would die – and always found myself disappointed when I didn’t.  My father died at 41, so after I turned 40, I thought the time of my demise was might be drawing nigh.  I remember spending a lot of time listening to the late quartets of Beethoven, thinking it would be the last time I would ever hear them.  Wrong again.

After that, but still thinking I might die young, I imagined that I might die at the age of one of my literary heroes at that time, George Orwell, who had died at 46 (though I mistakenly thought his death occurred when he was 47 – another one of those primes I love to detest).  But 47 came and went, but I didn’t; I remained.  I was beginning to lose faith in my ability to forecast when I would kick the bucket.

Eventually, after many years had passed without my having done so, I thought that I might die in the year 2012, at the end of which I would be 77 – a good time to die, I thought.  I actually had many reasons to think my time would come by the end of that year.  But I left feeling somewhat crestfallen at another failure to attain death.

I was beginning to think that, in this respect at least, I was like Freud who was very superstitious about death and, like me, had kept imagining he would die much sooner than he actually did (it was he who would die at 83).  He eventually came to fear that he wouldn’t die until he reached his mother’s death age, which was 95.  Well, I won’t have to worry about living to my mother’s age if I make it to 89.  She died at 88.

With the exception of my maternal grandfather, all the men in my family (at least on my mother’s side, and, to the extent I know, also on my father’s side) died young, none of them living longer than their mid-sixties.  What’s wrong with me?

I grew up a member of a quartet of male cousins. Two of them died around the age of eighty, and the third, the cousin to whom I am closest, is now 84, but has a terminal disease.  We joke about who will be the last cousin standing.  Anyone care to bet?

Well, I’ve given up trying to predict when I’ll die.  At a prophet, I have an unblemished record of failure when it comes to my own death.  But I’m convinced that if I pray long and hard enough, God will finally grant me release, so I still have hope, it not faith, I will get there in the end.  Wish me luck!

8 comments:

  1. andypetro@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. I too, am waiting to die. I'm 87 now, 70 years since I came back from the Light and I'm still here! Enough is enough, I want to go back Home. I don't like it here any more. As your book says ... I too am waiting to die! Thanks, see you in the Light! Andy

    ReplyDelete
  3. That's andypetro@gmail.com.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Brian Anthony KraemerOctober 24, 2024 at 12:14 PM

    If there was any creature on earth, with the exception of the human being, that was so miserable it was waiting to die, I would either kill it myself or give it enough pain killers or sleep inducers that rendered it peaceful or unconscious while letting it die a "natural" death.

    May I ask the unaskable question? Is it okay to destroy the physical body? I eat salmon (Fred, Sarah, and Ralph) routinely and Carol, the chicken, and Gustavo, the beef cattle without any thought to it. I squish spiders and cockroaches and mosquitoes without question. I pick flowers and mow lawns and kill millions of living organisms in my mouth every time I brush my teeth or floss or rinse with Listerine.

    Is there a redeeming, and perhaps even necessary, reason for the decline in life's quality as we near the transition we call death? For my thought, death doesn't exist unless the definition of death is transition from one state of being to another. There is also no "after-life" or "pre-life." One could say "after-this-incarnation" or "pre-this incarnation" but that is obviously wordy. There is life and life has infinite manifestations.

    I can certainly imagine a world in which taking the "purple pill" stops the heart and this incarnation is over, but whether it's my Catholic upbringing or my predominantly "Christian" worldview, I just can't really argue for it no matter how easy and convenient and even logical it might seem. "Thou shalt not kill" rings loudly in my ears.

    I would love to hear from the "sages" here. Perhaps Ken, you might share your thoughts or Andy Petro or someone else. I think all of us are a little bit afraid to consider such thoughts lest someone who is mentally unstable or seriously ill might think our words are all that's necessary to justify killing themselves. I certainly don't want that on my conscience. I personally expect to hang in here as long as I'm required to, but if I get too miserable I wouldn't feel guilty to stop eating or drinking or pretty much keeping myself pleasantly asleep with over-the-counter pain medication.

    I would never want to live in a world where people were killed when someone else considered them to be too costly or too much trouble, their lives "not worth living." That would be an awful situation.

    In a perfect world, we would live much more collectively and if our seniors wanting children around, the children would be there for them as well as loving pets. Seniors would be getting free massages and be surrounded by nature and flowers and good scents and pleasant, natural lighting and a fireplace in the winter and a cool breeze in the summer. No one would have to endure the inhumanities of our modern convalescent hospitals with two to four people in a cramped room, smelling of feces and urine, moaning, crying, shouting, begging, glassy-eyed hopelessness, and monitors buzzing, flashing, as those of us who have been in such places know.

    Anyway, now I've got subjects going, the acceptability of bringing one's own life to a close and also the inhumanity of modern-day ways of "caring" for seniors. The two are actually quite related because if one was living in an ideal setting I imagined and described above, perhaps he or she might not be so anxious to hasten his or her own departure.

    Any thoughts Ken? Perhaps in another blog?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ugh.. I feel this. I worry that I may live as long as my previous women before me.. the oldest woman in my bloodline lived to be 108 in the early 1920s! Good lord, no thank you! I’d always like to leave at 89, like my grandfather… and something tells me that you too, Ken, will be leaving at this age too. Maybe I have better luck predicting, we’ll see.

    Whenever you decide to leave us, Ken, have you thought of maybe giving a “sign” when you return home? My aunt told me before she died of cancer to look for owls, and I see them all the time now. I know she is watching, observing quietly.

    Mine will be crows. That’ll be my sign. My mothers will be the blue heron. Interested to see if you’d have a sign too, Ken.

    In light and love always,

    Kate K from PA.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I may not have all the right words to say, but I want you to know that I care about you deeply. You have shown incredible strength and grace throughout your declining health, and I admire your courage. Please know that I am here to listen and support you through this journey in any way I can. Thank you for allowing us to know you better through your wonderfully written blogs.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi! I want to say I have just discovered you and your research. Why I am here , is because I am wondering if I could please speak with you about a problem in my NDE research? It's attached to a story that brought tragedy. Can you please reach out? Fashia2000@yahoo.com. it's a old e-mail. AOL days :)
    I could really use your expertise.
    Thank you, Deb

    ReplyDelete
  8. I have a super Idea for you, Sir! I just read this post. I am so very sad to hear you are trapped in a failing meat suit. I am 54, i am nearly crippled myself. Arthritis is wicked. So, i wish you health and eye sight. I do have a great story that might be something for your research. I left my email above or below. Blessings,


    Deb

    ReplyDelete